About Me

Name: cehwiedel
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Sen. Feinstein Responds on Iraq

A while back, I emailed my senior senator regarding the situation in Iraq. She finally responded:


    Thank you for your letter concerning the situation in Iraq.  I
appreciate hearing your thoughts on this important issue and
welcome the opportunity to respond.

      President Bush's "stay the course" strategy has failed.  On
top of the serious intelligence blunders prior to the war, the
Administration's war planning was shortsighted and ill-conceived,
providing inadequate troop levels to secure Iraq, its infrastructure,
and its people.  The current situation, in which sectarian violence
wreaks havoc throughout the country, killing dozens of Iraqi
civilians every day and entangling our soldiers in a treacherous
quagmire, is unsustainable. 

      In the recent election, the American people expressed clear
disapproval with this Administration's Iraq policies.  With the
resignation of Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and the confirmation
of Dr. Robert Gates to replace him, I believe it is time for this
Administration to create a new, responsible strategy for Iraq. 
Congress must work together and across party lines to provide the
support and oversight needed for this new mission to succeed.

      As the Iraq Study Group's report suggests, we ought to
accelerate the training of Iraqi forces in order to restore security in
Iraq's neighborhoods and towns.  Our military's mission should
change from combat to one focused primarily on providing
logistics, training, and support. By early 2008, Iraqi military and
police forces must take primary responsibility for the security of
their country. 

      At the same time, military force alone will not resolve
sectarian tensions and violence in Iraq.  Strengthening Iraq's
political leadership and encouraging serious and fruitful dialogue
between Iraqi Shi'as, Sunnis, and Kurds is critical to Iraq's ability
to stand on its own once American troops leave.  Domestic
reconciliation efforts must be accompanied by a diplomatic
initiative, including Iran and Syria, to build an international
consensus on Iraq's reconstruction and address ongoing regional
disputes.  

      Finally, I expect incoming Secretary of Defense Gates to be
attentive to the views of our commanders on the ground.  The
failure of this Administration to heed the warnings of experienced
military officers is a major reason for our failures in Iraq.

      This war has distracted us from the important struggle
against terrorism, tying down our forces and creating a breeding-
ground for terrorists.  It is time for a change.  Please be assured
that I will continue to work hard across party lines in the 110th
Congress to promote a better strategy in Iraq.  We owe it to the
American people, our troops, and the people of Iraq.

She regards the Iraq Study Group and its report as the bee's knees. Oy.

[You are invited to visit www.cehwiedel.com, where I write on many topics other than the members of the California delegation to the United States Senate.]

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Defunding an AIDS Research Clinic

Senator Barbara Boxer is protesting a decision by the Director of the National Institutes of Health to defund an AIDS research clinic in Los Angeles. From the Senator's press release:

I write to express my deep concern that National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for the Clinical Trial Unit at the LAC+USC Medical Center Rand Schrader Clinic in Los Angeles has been eliminated. The Clinic has served a needy client population with excellence for twenty years, and I request that you take immediate action to restore its funding.

The two reasons she gives for protesting the closure are the loss of valuable research subjects, and the inability of the clinic's participants to travel to the next closest facility.

No space is given to a consideration of the cost of keeping the facility open, or to what other item might be cut from the NIH's budget to make up the money.

For more information on California's Senate delegation, visit the California Senators Squidoo Lens.

[You are invited to visit www.cehwiedel.com, where I write on many topics other than the esteemed members of the California delegation to the United States Senate.]



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

DiFi Press Release

Following up on an earlier post about Senator Feinstein and electronic voting machines, here is her press release touting new legislation to ensure the integrity of votes cast on the machines that Democrats were loudly clamoring for in the wake of the 2006 presidential election:

Washington, DC – U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), scheduled to become the new Chairman of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee for the 110th Congress, today issued the following statement regarding electronic voting reform:

“A draft report by the National Institute of Standards and Technology made public today reaffirms my belief that there are serious questions about the security and reliability of paperless electronic voting machines. It further demonstrates the importance of moving forward with new legislation to require that there be an independent paper record of every ballot.

I plan to introduce that legislation at the beginning of the new Congress and hold hearings soon after, with the intent of moving the bill to the Senate floor as soon as possible. As we’ve seen in Sarasota, Florida, where officials have been unable to account for about 18,000 undervotes in the Congressional election, it is crucial that there be an independent record that can be reviewed by election officials.

One-third of voters cast their ballots in the midterm election using new electronic voting machines, and problems arose, not only in Florida, but in various jurisdictions across the country. We must do everything we can to restore confidence in the outcomes of elections by helping to ensure that every vote cast by an American citizen is recorded accurately and that every eligible voter can, in fact, cast a ballot.”

Background:

The report by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is scheduled to be considered next week by the Technical Guidelines Development Committee. This Committee is charged with advising the Election Assistance Commission by providing recommendations on voluntary standards and guidelines related to voting equipment and technologies. A copy of the report is available at: http://vote.nist.gov/DraftWhitePaperOnSIinVVSG2007-20061120.pdf

A summary of the Ballot Integrity Act follows:

The Ballot Integrity Act  

  • Paper Records, Voter Verification and Audit: Requires that voting machines produce a paper record that voters can verify, and correct if necessary, after casting their vote. Also requires that the paper record be preserved and used in a mandatory, random audit.
  • Electronic Voting System Security: Takes measures to prevent technological manipulation of electronic voting systems and requires that all voting system software be disclosed to and certified by the Election Assistance Commission.

  • Campaign Activities by Election Officials: Prohibits a chief state election official from serving on any political campaign committee of a candidate for Federal office, making any public comments in support of a candidate in an official capacity, or soliciting political contributions on behalf of any candidate for Federal office.
  • Official Election Observers: Grants all official, legitimate domestic and international election observers unrestricted access to the election process, provided that they accept election rules, do not interfere with the election process, respect the secrecy of the ballot and are accredited by the Election Assistance Commission.
  • Military and Overseas Voting: Makes it easier for overseas and military voters to send in absentee ballot requests, absentee ballots and voter registration forms by prohibiting states from refusing to accept ballots and registration forms due to non-essential requirements (such as size and stock of paper, and whether or not it is notarized).
  • Enforcement of HAVA Provisions: Clarifies that individuals can pursue legal resolution of violations of the Help America Vote Act. Permanently extends the authorization of the Election Assistance Committee. Requires that contractors hired by the Commission go through a public bidding process.

For more information about Senators Feinstein and Boxer, visit the California Senate Delegation Squidoo Lens.

[You are invited to visit www.cehwiedel.com, where I write on many topics other than the esteemed members of the California delegation to the United States Senate.]

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Opportunities of Modern Technology

After the 2004 election, Democrats yelled loudly that electronic voting machines were needed to preserve the integrity of elections. It turns out that electronic voting machines have merely preserved the opportunity for politicians to increase the scope of government regulation.

Case in point, Daniel Weintraub writes in the California Insider about Senator Dianne Feinstein's concern about electronic voting machines, and her consquent plans for legislation in the new Congress that will be seated in January.

For more information, visit the California Senate Delegation Squidoo Lens.

[You are invited to visit www.cehwiedel.com, where I write about many topics others than the members of the California delegation to the United States Senate.]

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Kick 'Em After They're Dead

Senator Feinstein, jointly with Senator Jeff Sessions, has introduced a bill to prevent a federal criminal conviction from being vacated if a defendant dies before the appeal has run its course:

Bill Summary

Specifically, the bill would:

  • Establish that, if a defendant dies after being convicted of a federal offense, his conviction will not be vacated. Instead, the court will be directed to issue a statement stating that the defendant was convicted (either by a guilty plea or a verdict finding him guilty) but then died before his case or appeal was final.
  • Codify the current rule that no further criminal punishments can be imposed on a person who is convicted if they die before a sentence is imposed or they have an opportunity to appeal their conviction.
  • Clarify that, unlike criminal punishment, all other relief (such as restitution to the victims) that could have been sought against a convicted defendant can continue to be pursued and collected after the defendant’s death.
  • Establish a process to ensure that after a person dies, a representative of his estate can stand in the shoes of the defendant and challenge or appeal his conviction if they want, and can also secure a lawyer - either on their own or by having one appointed.
Additionally, if the Government had filed a criminal forfeiture action — seeking a criminal punishment to reach assets which it had sought to reach the defendant’s assets that were linked to his crimes — the Government would get an extra 2 years after the defendant’s death to file a parallel civil forfeiture lawsuit so that it could try to recover those same assets in a different and traditionally-accepted manner.

The main motivation here seems to be asset recovery, i.e., money. Nothing in current law stops the civil suits from proceeding against the defendant's estate. Ths bill would just make it easier for the government to go after assets of the estate.

Sounds like a bad idea.

For more information about the California Senate delegation, visit the California Senate Delegation Squidoo Lens.

[You are invited to visit www.cehwiedel.com, where I write about many topics other than the esteemed members of the California delegation to the United States Senate.]

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Feinstein Amends

The main goal of the lame-duck session of Congress seems to be passage of earmark-laden appropriations bills and election of new leadership.

Today's business was mostly conducted by voice vote, with no record votes taken.

According to the Daily Record, Senator Feinstein was responsible for two Amendments adopted today:

Hutchison (for Feinstein) Amendment No. 5126, to repeal the requirement for the Secretary of the Interior to cease the plan to exterminate the deer and elk population on Santa Rosa Island, Channel Islands, California.

Just on a guess, I would say that those deer and elk aren't native to the island, and are overrunning the local ecosystem as badly as the hand-fed ducks at our local pocket park. I would also guess that somebody wailed about the cruelty of exterminating the noble ruminants. Has anyone notified PETA that Senator Feinstein has unchained the Secretary of the Interior and loosed him on the unsuspecting deer and elk of Santa Rosa Island?

Hutchison (for Feinstein) Amendment No. 5127, to require a report on actions taken by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to test veterans for vestibular damage.

I could make a lame joke about shoddy architecture, but I'll bite my tongue instead. This would seem to be a request for a progress report regarding heart exams for military veterans. On its face, not objectionable.

For more information on the California Senatorial Delegation, visit the California Senate Delegation Squidoo Lens.

[You are invited to visit www.cehwiedel.com, where I write on many topics other than the members of the California delegation to the United States Senate.]




Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

War or Not? Boxer v. Pelosi

In a recent statement, House Speaker-in-waiting Nancy Pelosi characterized our engagement in Iraq this way:

The point is this isn’t a war to win, it’s a situation to solve.

But in a recent press release that contained the text of her letter to
Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the Army, California's junior Senator, Barbara Boxer, railed at alledged misleading tactics used by Army recruiters:

I am writing to express my deep dismay over new evidence that Army recruiters are providing grossly misleading information to potential recruits in an effort to convince them to enlist.

According to an ABC News report, nearly half of the recruiters profiled in an undercover investigation knowingly provided misleading information to potential recruits about the risks of enlisting in the U.S. Army. In one particularly shocking clip of the investigation, a recruiter is seen telling a recruit that the United States is “not at war,” and that the “war ended a long time ago.” Another is seen telling a recruit that “we are bringing people back” from Iraq.

This is not only a disservice to the potential recruit, but a shocking abuse of authority and the public trust.

Senator Boxer must believe that whatever we're doing in Iraq is war, or she couldn't accuse the Army recruiters of misleading potential recruits.

So, perhaps, the communication lines between Senate and House need the static cleaned up.

For more information on the California Senate Delegation, visit the California Senate Delegation Squidoo Lens.

[You are invited to visit www.cehwiedel.com, where I write on many topics other than the members of the California delegation to the United States Senate.]



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Legislative Priority Polls

Both Senator Feinstein and Senator Boxer are expected to chair a Senate Committee in the 110th Congress that will be seated in January 2007.

Both Senators have expressed opinions on what the legislative priorities should be for those Committees.

Please participate to vote in a quick poll for each Senator at the California Senate Delegation Squidoo Lens on whether you agree with their stated legislative priorities.

[You are invited to visit www.cehwiedel.com, where I write on many topics other than the esteemed members of the California delegation to the United States Senate.]

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Boxer to Chair Environment & Public Works

According to an article in today's deadtree edition of the Orange County Register, Barbara Boxer will chair the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.

The Democratic sweep of Congress means that Sen. Barbara Boxer will realize a 14-year goal to head the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

…Besides her work with such social matters as women's and abortion rights, the environment has been Boxer's signature cause for her years in the Senate and as a member of the Marin County Board of Supervisors.

"This is a dream come true for me," Boxer told reporters during a conference call Thursday. "We can make an enormous difference in people's lives."

Boxer sat down with her environmental staff on Wednesday and began mapping strategy for her committee. She will be back in Washington, D.C., for next week's lame-duck session to continue that planning.

…Environmental staff members at the White House have let the senator's committee director know they want to meet to talk about gobal warming.

And that's something Boxer is determined to work on.

"Time is running out, and we need to move forward on that," Boxer said. "If we don't move forward, it gets more expensive to take action." Boxer pointed to California's first-in-the-nation law regulating greenhouse gases as a model.

"Under the current leadership of the committee, we had one hearing on global warming," Boxer said, and the witness was novelist Michael Crichton. She plans a series of discussions.

Oh, crikey. At least she'll provide lots of fodder to waste pixels over. Since she'll be in Washington for the lame-duck session, it might prove effective to email her your views on global warming.

For more information on the California Senate delegation, visit the California Senate Delegation Squidoo Lens.

[You are invited to visit www.cehwiedel.com, where I write on many topics other than the members of the California delegation to the United States Senate.]

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Feinstein to Chair Rules Committee

According to an article in today's deadtree edition of the Orange County Register, Senator Dianne Feinstein will likely chair the Senate Rules Committee.

…Sen. Dianne Feinstein is in line to head the Rules Committee, which has jurisdiction over such issues as federal election policy, lobbying and earmarking rules.

…Feinstein has said that she sees "a real need to have overall federal standards for elections. …Here we are, technologically the most sophisticated nation on Earth, and voting was more reliable when we had old technology. It just doesn't make sense."

Feinstein was not available Thursday to talk about her impending chairmanship. But in addition to the voting legislation, her written legislative priorities include a bill to ensure transparency in the earmark process. An earmark is the name given to local projects that benefit one congressional district or state. Often they are added to bills without any debate or without the knowledge of most of the sponsor's colleagues.

I am all for transparency in earmarking. Go, Porkbusters! But I really really don't want the federal government to dictate election policy to the states. That would be a strongly coercive centralization of power.

No mention is made of whether Senator Feinstein will attend next week's lame-duck session. However, it can't hurt to email her your opinion on her views on federal standards for election policy.

For more information on the California Senate delegation, visit the California Senators Squidoo Lens.

[You are invited to visit www.cehwiedel.com, where I write about many topics other than the members of the California delegation to the United States Senate.]

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Boxer on Rummy

A press release from the office of Senator Boxer on the resignation of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld:

“This election has already had an impact on foreign policy. Without Rumsfeld we have a chance to move forward in a bipartisan fashion to find a political solution.

“History will not judge Donald Rumsfeld kindly.”

Better check your shoulder straps — looks like a bumpy ride for the next two years.

For more information on the members of the California delegation to the U.S. Senate, visit the California Senate Delegation Squidoo Lens.

[You are invited to visit www.cehwiedel.com, where I write on many topics other than the members of the California delegation to the United States Senate.]

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Feinstein on Rummy

A press release from Senator Feinstein's office after the announcement that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld would retire:

“The resignation of Secretary Rumsfeld is welcome and could represent a significant shift in direction by this Administration. I hope it opens the door to fresh ideas on Iraq.

Last night, the American people made their view clear that there needs to be change in Iraq policy. It seems that the message was received. I only wish it had been sooner.

Secretary Rumsfeld was stubborn and arrogant. He did not listen. He did not change course when it was apparent that a new path was needed.

Secretary Rumsfeld presided over a failed policy in Iraq. The borders were not secured. The munitions dumps were left unguarded. There was no follow-on force. There were not enough troops. This was the recipe for the chaos and violence that has ensued.

Under his leadership, we have seen our military stretched thin and its readiness diminished.

Bottom line: Secretary Rumsfeld’s resignation is welcome. I hope that the President’s nominee will work with the Congress to restore a clear-eyed and pragmatic view to our nation’s defense policy.

Buckle your seatbelts — looks like a bumpy ride.

For more information on the members of the California Delegation to the United States Senate, visit the California Senate Delegation Squidoo Lens.

[You are invited to visit www.cehwiedel.com, where I write on many topics other than the esteemed members of the California delegation to the United States Senate.]



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The New Senate

The makeup of the new Congress that will begin in January 2007 wil be 49 Republicans, 49 Democrats and 2 Independents. (Good on Joe Lieberman. Congratulations, people of Connecticut.)

Meantime, the putative incoming Speaker of the House in the new Congress, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), characterized what we face in Iraq as "not a war to be won but a situation to be solved."

So a nicely sized task today is to email newly re-elected Senator Feinstein and four-years-to-go Senator Boxer to find out whether they agree with Speaker-to-be Pelosi.

For more information on the members of the California delegation to the United States Senate, visit the California Senate Delegation Squidoo Lens.

[You are invited to visit www.cehwiedel.com, where I write on many topics other than the esteemed members of the California delegation to the United States Senate.]

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Election Results: Foggy in the Morning

Well.

Dick Mountjoy has dropped back to a less remarkable 35% with 98% of the precincts counted.

Hugh Hewitt has contibuted a combative response to the mixed results of yesterday's election, similar to my own take on the re-election of Dianne Feinstein: all conservative opinion peddlars rejoice! Our targets are much fatter now!

Of course, there's a downside. Dreary and meddlesome Congressional hearings, for instance.

Things could have gone worse, but they could also have been less harsh. So while the Democrats have control of the House of Representatives, and may control the Senate, the margin is razor thin. Republicans should be able to exploit that.

The next election cycle will present no California Senators for re-election, so this blog will have to content itself with building up ammunition for Senator Boxer's 2010 re-election run. That shouldn't be hard at all.

See you in the hustings.

For more information on the members of the California delegation to the United States Senate, visit the California Senators Squidoo Lens.

[You are invited to visit www.cehwiedel.com, where I write on many topics other than the members of the California delegation to the United States Senate.]

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Kyl Wins Arizona

Some time ago, I suggested that California conservatives send their money to support John Kyl's re-election effort in Arizona rather than throw away their money on a bound-to-lose Dick Mountjoy.

I am happy to report that The Blogging Caesar at Election Projection has now called the Arizona Senate race for Mr. Kyl.

Meantime, much to my pleased surprise, Mr. Mountjoy is making a better showing than I expected. With almost 14% of the precincts counted, Mr. Mountjoy has 41% to Mrs. Feinstein's 54%. That's about 10 percentage points more than I would have guessed. Good on you, Mr. Mountjoy!

Imagine what might have been if the California GOP (and the NRSC) had actually provided logistical and financial support! The mind boggles.

For more information about the members of the California delegation to the United States Senate, visit the California Senators Squidoo Lens.

[You are invited to visit www.cehwiedel.com, where I write on many topics other than the members of the California delegation to the United States Senate.]

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive